LIT_129: Frieden et al. (2021) Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Communities in the EU

Source

doi:10.3390/su132212494 — original publication (opens in a new tab; the file is not redistributed)

Context: thesis · No NI feeds (shallow ingest)

Summary

Frieden et al. review how the EU frames self-consumption and energy communities under the Renewable Energy Directive (REDII) and the Electricity Market Directive. The value for the thesis is definitional: the directive separates an individual “renewables self-consumer” from a group of “jointly acting renewables self-consumers”, the collective case, so the paper states in one place what self-sufficiency means at the household scale and at the community scale. It gives the literature review the clean individual-versus-community distinction the argument needs, with the quantified counterpart supplied by LIT_128. Subordinate to the settled frameworks Bustamin (LIT_001) and the FEW nexus; the EU energy-law framing is illustrative, not an operational model.

Key thesis insights

  • Individual self-consumption (the household scale). Quoting the REDII (Section 3, “Definitions and Concepts of the EU Framework”, p.5), a “renewables self-consumer” is “a final customer operating within its premises located within confined boundaries… who generates renewable electricity for its own consumption, and who may store or sell self-generated renewable electricity, provided that, for a non-household renewables self-consumer, those activities do not constitute its primary commercial or professional activity”. This is self-sufficiency as single-actor, on-site autonomy. LIT_129
  • Collective self-consumption (the community scale). The directive defines “jointly acting renewables self-consumers” as “a group of at least two jointly acting renewables self-consumers… who are located in the same building or multi-apartment block” (p.5). The paper adopts the common term collective self-consumption for “initiatives of joint generation and consumption”. The contrast between the two definitions is the individual-to-collective, independence-to-interdependence line the research draws. LIT_129

Notes

  • Role. The definitional anchor for the individual-versus-community distinction. Pair with LIT_128 (the quantified evidence).
  • Provenance. Authentic MDPI publisher PDF (Sustainability 13(22):12494, CC BY), verified after download (pdftotext, DOI and title confirmed). The file is the authoritative article, not AI-prepared, so no retrieval-provenance block. The 2020 REScoop working-paper twin (same lead authors, same definitional section) is superseded by this peer-reviewed version and was not ingested.
  • Scope. context thesis, feeds empty, shallow ingest. EU energy law is cited as a conceptual illustration, not applied to any NZ calculation. No research target opened.

Connections

Links to

Sources (2): LIT_001 · LIT_128

Referenced by

Sources (2): LIT_128 · REG_044