NEOBIOME

URL_015: EECA Community Renewable Energy Fund (CREF) — funded sites & per-site benchmark ($88k / 28 kW + 32 kWh)

Properties3
typesource
source_typeurl
topicsregulation_policy, nz_specific

4 min read

URL_015: EECA Community Renewable Energy Fund (CREF) — funded sites & per-site benchmark ($88k / 28 kW + 32 kWh)

Source

https://www.eeca.govt.nz/co-funding-and-support/products/community-renewable-energy-fund/ — original source (opens in a new tab; the file is not redistributed)

EECA Community Renewable Energy Fund (CREF)

The EECA primary behind the CREF $88k/site benchmark already in the wiki (RT_090)

EECA’s Community Renewable Energy Fund co-funds solar-PV + battery systems at community-resilience sites (marae, schools, halls, places of worship). Programme benchmark: ~217 sites by end-2025, average $88k/site at ~28 kW solar + ~32 kWh battery. The CREF figures were already in the wiki via CR_008 (a synthesis); this is the EECA programme source behind them. ⚠ AI-extracted via WebSearch; data_quality medium.

Summary

CREF is an EECA co-funding programme that part-funds renewable energy (predominantly solar PV + battery storage) at community buildings selected for emergency resilience, in partnership with regional authorities, iwi/Māori organisations and Civil Defence. It provides a published programme-level cost benchmark for small community PV+battery systems; the detailed per-site list is separately downloadable from EECA.

Key claims

- claim: "CREF programme scale: in July 2025 EECA approved 22 regional partners for $9.6 million in co-funding, with regional partners committing a further $3.2 million. By the end of 2025, an estimated ~217 community-resilience sites will have been selected to receive a solar-PV + battery system. Sites prioritised are community buildings — marae, places of worship, schools and community halls — identified for emergency/energy resilience with government agencies, local authorities, Civil Defence, and community/Māori organisations."
  source_location: "EECA CREF product page; MBIE CREF page"
- claim: "Per-site benchmark: average cost ~$88,000 per site, at an average ~28 kW solar PV and ~32 kWh battery storage."
  source_location: "EECA CREF product page (downloadable partner/site lists)"

Retrieval provenance

  • Upstream source: EECA Community Renewable Energy Fund product page + MBIE CREF page.
  • Retrieved via: WebSearch (web research), 2026-06-12.
  • Prompt: EECA CREF funded-sites list and per-site cost benchmark (partners, $ co-funding, site count, average cost, average solar/battery size, site types).
  • Verification: AI-extracted from search results, unverified — the detailed per-site list (per-site cost variation, community type, region) is a separate EECA download not retrieved here. data_quality: medium; confirm against the EECA page before relying on these figures.

Neobiome Intelligence relevance

The EECA primary behind the CREF cost benchmark already carried in the wiki (D01 / I01, via CR_008): **~88k for 28 kW + 32 kWh**. It cross-checks the model's component costs — 28 kW × ~1,600 NZD/kW (community PV, [[cr_024_nz-community-pv-battery-cost-2026|CR_024]]) + 32 kWh × ~1,400 NZD/kWh (battery) ≈ 90k, closely matching the 88k all-in. **But two caveats keep it off the calibration path:** (1) CREF systems are **grant-subsidised** (so 88k is not the full unsubsidised cost), and (2) at 28 kW/32 kWh they are 7–25× smaller than a community-energy hub and CREF is not an openly contestable fund (needs a regional-authority/iwi partner; community trusts not directly eligible) — so it anchors a resilience-microgrid, not a self-sufficiency hub (CR_024). For I01 (community finance), CREF’s ~25% EECA / ~75% partner co-funding is one NZ funding route, though CR_024 finds a PPA the more realistic path to hub scale. Resolves RT_090 (programme benchmark; the granular per-site download is a low-priority extension).

Research targets

Research gaps

  • The detailed CREF 217-site downloadable list (per-site cost variation, community type, regional distribution) remains separately retrievable from EECA — low priority (programme benchmark already captured). No new RT opened.
  • The Round 2 regional-partner co-funding breakdown (22 named partners, per-partner EECA amounts, 9.6M EECA + 3.2M partner) is now held as a delivery-stage primary via OT_150 — distinct from the per-site 217-list above, which remains the separate low-priority extension. ⚠ That primary shows the EECA:partner pool split is ≈75%:25% (EECA the majority funder), the inverse of this page’s “~25% EECA / ~75% partner” characterisation — reconcile: the ~25% here most likely means EECA’s share of each site’s full installed cost (per-site grant proportion), not the EECA:partner pool split. Do not treat the two ratios as the same quantity.

Connections

Links to

Sources (3): CR_008 · CR_024 · OT_150

Referenced by

Sources (4): LIT_084 · OT_119 · OT_120 · OT_150

EDT domains (1): D01: Renewable Energy & Storage Systems

SSI indicators (1): I01: Financial & Economic Self-Sufficiency

Graph View

Backlinks